ÁñÁ«ÊÓƵ

Object moved to here.

Practical Guide to Quality Control in Surgical Trials | Surgery | JAMA Surgery | ÁñÁ«ÊÓƵ Network

ÁñÁ«ÊÓƵ

[Skip to Navigation]
Sign In
1.
Robinson  NB, Fremes  S, Hameed  I,  et al.  Characteristics of randomized clinical trials in surgery from 2008 to 2020: a systematic review.   ÁñÁ«ÊÓƵ Netw Open. 2021;4(6):e2114494. doi:
2.
Abraham  NS, Young  JM, Solomon  MJ.  A systematic review of reasons for nonentry of eligible patients into surgical randomized controlled trials.  Ìý³§³Ü°ù²µ±ð°ù²â. 2006;139(4):469-483. doi:
3.
Lilford  RJ, Braunholtz  DA, Greenhalgh  R, Edwards  SJ. Ìý°Õ°ù¾±²¹±ô²õ and fast changing technologies: the case for tracker studies.  Ìýµþ²Ñ´³. 2000;320(7226):43-46. doi:
4.
Richman  JS, Boughey  JC. Adaptive trial designs. In: Itani  KMF, Reda  DJ, eds.  Clinical Trials Design in Operative and Non Operative Invasive Procedures. Springer; 2017:99-107.
5.
Cook  JA.  The challenges faced in the design, conduct and analysis of surgical randomised controlled trials.  Ìý°Õ°ù¾±²¹±ô²õ. 2009;10:9. doi:
6.
Farrokhyar  F, Karanicolas  PJ, Thoma  A,  et al.  Randomized controlled trials of surgical interventions.   Ann Surg. 2010;251(3):409-416. doi:
7.
Cook  JA, Elders  A, Boachie  C,  et al.  A systematic review of the use of an expertise-based randomised controlled trial design.  Ìý°Õ°ù¾±²¹±ô²õ. 2015;16:241. doi:
Guide to Statistics and Methods
Randomized Clinical Trials in Surgery
October 26, 2022

Practical Guide to Quality Control in Surgical Trials

Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology and Endocrine Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • 2Department of Emergency Medicine, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, Torrance
  • 3Division of Digestive Surgery and Urology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
  • 4Department of Surgery, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
  • 5Statistical Editor, JAMA Surgery
JAMA Surg. 2023;158(1):91-92. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2022.4898

Quality control in clinical trials can comprise several different domains (Box). In many trials, this may primarily include ensuring adherence to study protocols and data integrity. Procedural trials introduce an additional difficulty, ie, the variability inherent in procedures performed by different health care professionals in heterogeneous environments for slightly variable clinical conditions.

Data integrity is fundamental to the performance of a quality clinical trial. Intentional falsifications are much less common than unintentional errors and oversights. Good data begin with accurate data entry and are greatly facilitated by electronic medical record systems and automated data transfer. Participants can directly enter their pain scores or questionnaire answers into electronic systems, thereby obviating the chance for transcriptional errors. A surveillance strategy to prevent missing data should be created, as well as a plan for the statistical handling of missing data. Data integrity should be maintained by periodic audits verifying the recorded study data against original source documents. The timing and frequency of audits should be determined before study commencement, with a frequency and rigor appropriate to the risks and complexity of the study.

×