ÁñÁ«ÊÓƵ

Object moved to here.

Familial Hypercholesterolemia Variant and Cardiovascular Risk in Individuals With Elevated Cholesterol | Genetics and Genomics | JAMA Cardiology | ÁñÁ«ÊÓƵ Network

ÁñÁ«ÊÓƵ

[Skip to Navigation]
Sign In
1.
Gidding ÌýSS, Champagne ÌýMA, de Ferranti ÌýSD, Ìýet al; American Heart Association Atherosclerosis, Hypertension, and Obesity in Young Committee of Council on Cardiovascular Disease in Young, Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing, Council on Functional Genomics and Translational Biology, and Council on Lifestyle and Cardiometabolic Health. ÌýThe agenda for familial hypercholesterolemia: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association.Ìý Ìý°ä¾±°ù³¦³Ü±ô²¹³Ù¾±´Ç²Ô. 2015;132(22):2167-2192. doi:
2.
de Ferranti ÌýSD, Rodday ÌýAM, Mendelson ÌýMM, Wong ÌýJB, Leslie ÌýLK, Sheldrick ÌýRC. ÌýPrevalence of familial hypercholesterolemia in the 1999 to 2012 United States National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES).Ìý Ìý°ä¾±°ù³¦³Ü±ô²¹³Ù¾±´Ç²Ô. 2016;133(11):1067-1072. doi:
3.
Stone ÌýNJ, Robinson ÌýJG, Lichtenstein ÌýAH, Ìýet al; American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Ìý2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.Ìý Ìý°ä¾±°ù³¦³Ü±ô²¹³Ù¾±´Ç²Ô. 2014;129(25)(suppl 2):S1-S45. doi:
4.
Nordestgaard ÌýBG, Benn ÌýM. ÌýGenetic testing for familial hypercholesterolaemia is essential in individuals with high LDL cholesterol: who does it in the world?Ìý ÌýEur Heart J. 2017;38(20):1580-1583. doi:
5.
Daniels ÌýSR, Gidding ÌýSS, de Ferranti ÌýSD; National Lipid Association Expert Panel on Familial Hypercholesterolemia. ÌýPediatric aspects of familial hypercholesterolemias: recommendations from the National Lipid Association Expert Panel on Familial Hypercholesterolemia.Ìý ÌýJ Clin Lipidol. 2011;5(3)(suppl):S30-S37. doi:
6.
Ray ÌýKK, Pillas ÌýD, Hadjiphilippou ÌýS, Ìýet al. ÌýPremature morbidity and mortality associated with potentially undiagnosed familial hypercholesterolemia in the general population.Ìý ÌýAm J Prev Cardiol. 2023;15:100580. doi:
7.
Defesche ÌýJC, Lansberg ÌýPJ, Umans-Eckenhausen ÌýMA, Kastelein ÌýJJ. ÌýAdvanced method for the identification of patients with inherited hypercholesterolemia.Ìý ÌýSemin Vasc Med. 2004;4(1):59-65. doi:
8.
ÌýRisk of fatal coronary heart disease in familial hypercholesterolaemia. Scientific Steering Committee on behalf of the Simon Broome Register Group.Ìý Ìýµþ²Ñ´³. 1991;303(6807):893-896. doi:
9.
Sturm ÌýAC, Knowles ÌýJW, Gidding ÌýSS, Ìýet al; Convened by the Familial Hypercholesterolemia Foundation. ÌýClinical genetic testing for familial hypercholesterolemia: JACC Scientific Expert Panel.Ìý ÌýJ Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72(6):662-680. doi:
10.
Abul-Husn ÌýNS, Manickam ÌýK, Jones ÌýLK, Ìýet al. ÌýGenetic identification of familial hypercholesterolemia within a single US health care system.Ìý Ìý³§³¦¾±±ð²Ô³¦±ð. 2016;354(6319):aaf7000. doi:
11.
Khera ÌýAV, Won ÌýHH, Peloso ÌýGM, Ìýet al. ÌýDiagnostic yield and clinical utility of sequencing familial hypercholesterolemia genes in patients with severe hypercholesterolemia.Ìý ÌýJ Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67(22):2578-2589. doi:
12.
Patel ÌýAP, Wang ÌýM, Fahed ÌýAC, Ìýet al. ÌýAssociation of rare pathogenic DNA variants for familial hypercholesterolemia, hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome, and lynch syndrome with disease risk in adults according to family history.Ìý Ìý´³´¡²Ñ´¡ Netw Open. 2020;3(4):e203959. doi:
13.
Zhang ÌýY, Dron ÌýJS, Bellows ÌýBK, Ìýet al. ÌýAssociation of severe hypercholesterolemia and familial hypercholesterolemia genotype with risk of coronary heart disease.Ìý Ìý°ä¾±°ù³¦³Ü±ô²¹³Ù¾±´Ç²Ô. 2023;147(20):1556-1559. doi:
14.
ÌýThe Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study: design and objectives. The ARIC investigators.Ìý ÌýAm J Epidemiol. 1989;129(4):687-702. doi:
15.
Friedman ÌýGD, Cutter ÌýGR, Donahue ÌýRP, Ìýet al. ÌýCARDIA: study design, recruitment, and some characteristics of the examined subjects.Ìý ÌýJ Clin Epidemiol. 1988;41(11):1105-1116. doi:
16.
Fried ÌýLP, Borhani ÌýNO, Enright ÌýP, Ìýet al. ÌýThe Cardiovascular Health Study: design and rationale.Ìý ÌýAnn Epidemiol. 1991;1(3):263-276. doi:
17.
Feinleib ÌýM, Kannel ÌýWB, Garrison ÌýRJ, McNamara ÌýPM, Castelli ÌýWP. ÌýThe Framingham Offspring Study. design and preliminary data.Ìý ÌýPrev Med. 1975;4(4):518-525. doi:
18.
Sempos ÌýCT, Bild ÌýDE, Manolio ÌýTA. ÌýOverview of the Jackson Heart Study: a study of cardiovascular diseases in African American men and women.Ìý ÌýAm J Med Sci. 1999;317(3):142-146. doi:
19.
Taylor ÌýHA ÌýJr., Wilson ÌýJG, Jones ÌýDW, Ìýet al. ÌýToward resolution of cardiovascular health disparities in African Americans: design and methods of the Jackson Heart Study.Ìý ÌýEthn Dis. 2005;15(4 Suppl 6):S6-4-17.
20.
Bild ÌýDE, Bluemke ÌýDA, Burke ÌýGL, Ìýet al. ÌýMulti-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis: objectives and design.Ìý ÌýAm J Epidemiol. 2002;156(9):871-881. doi:
21.
Oelsner ÌýEC, Balte ÌýPP, Cassano ÌýPA, Ìýet al. ÌýHarmonization of respiratory data from 9 US population-based cohorts: the NHLBI Pooled Cohorts Study.Ìý ÌýAm J Epidemiol. 2018;187(11):2265-2278. doi:
22.
Frank ÌýATH, Zhao ÌýB, Jose ÌýPO, Azar ÌýKMJ, Fortmann ÌýSP, Palaniappan ÌýLP. ÌýRacial/ethnic differences in dyslipidemia patterns.Ìý Ìý°ä¾±°ù³¦³Ü±ô²¹³Ù¾±´Ç²Ô. 2014;129(5):570-579. doi:
23.
Doi ÌýT, Hori ÌýM, Harada-Shiba ÌýM, Ìýet al. ÌýPatients with LDLR and PCSK9 gene variants experienced higher incidence of cardiovascular outcomes in heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia.Ìý ÌýJ Am Heart Assoc. 2021;10(4):e018263. doi:
24.
Bryant ÌýKB, Moran ÌýAE, Kazi ÌýDS, Ìýet al. ÌýCost-effectiveness of hypertension treatment by pharmacists in Black barbershops.Ìý Ìý°ä¾±°ù³¦³Ü±ô²¹³Ù¾±´Ç²Ô. 2021;143(24):2384-2394. doi:
25.
Kohli-Lynch ÌýCN, Bellows ÌýBK, Zhang ÌýY, Ìýet al. ÌýCost-effectiveness of lipid-lowering treatments in young adults.Ìý ÌýJ Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;78(20):1954-1964. doi:
26.
Bucholz ÌýEM, Rodday ÌýAM, Kolor ÌýK, Khoury ÌýMJ, de Ferranti ÌýSD. ÌýPrevalence and predictors of cholesterol screening, awareness, and statin treatment among US adults with familial hypercholesterolemia or other forms of severe dyslipidemia (1999-2014).Ìý Ìý°ä¾±°ù³¦³Ü±ô²¹³Ù¾±´Ç²Ô. 2018;137(21):2218-2230. doi:
27.
Perak ÌýAM, Ning ÌýH, de Ferranti ÌýSD, Gooding ÌýHC, Wilkins ÌýJT, Lloyd-Jones ÌýDM. ÌýLong-term risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in US adults with the familial hypercholesterolemia phenotype.Ìý Ìý°ä¾±°ù³¦³Ü±ô²¹³Ù¾±´Ç²Ô. 2016;134(1):9-19. doi:
28.
Bellows ÌýBK, Khera ÌýAV, Zhang ÌýY, Ìýet al. ÌýEstimated yield of screening for heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia with and without genetic testing in US adults.Ìý ÌýJ Am Heart Assoc. 2022;11(11):e025192. doi:
29.
Safarova ÌýMS, Liu ÌýH, Kullo ÌýIJ. ÌýRapid identification of familial hypercholesterolemia from electronic health records: the SEARCH study.Ìý ÌýJ Clin Lipidol. 2016;10(5):1230-1239. doi:
30.
Ahmad ÌýZS, Andersen ÌýRL, Andersen ÌýLH, Ìýet al. ÌýUS physician practices for diagnosing familial hypercholesterolemia: data from the CASCADE-FH registry.Ìý ÌýJ Clin Lipidol. 2016;10(5):1223-1229. doi:
31.
Knowles ÌýJW, Rader ÌýDJ, Khoury ÌýMJ. ÌýCascade screening for familial hypercholesterolemia and the use of genetic testing.Ìý Ìý´³´¡²Ñ´¡. 2017;318(4):381-382. doi:
1 Comment for this article
EXPAND ALL
Important paper that shows why genetic testing for FH variants is clinically of low value
James Stein, MD | UW-Madison
This is really important work. It confirms the low prevalence of FH variants among people with elevated LDL-C (over 190 mg/dl) and clarifies that the CVD risk increase associated with a variant is due to long-term exposure to high LDL-C (LDL-cholesterol-years, like "pack-years"). Based on this and previous reports, it is very hard to believe that genetic testing will be useful until it becomes much less expensive and more easy to perform in a clinical setting. But even then, with only 2.5% prevalence in people with LDL-C>=190 mg/dL (who need to be treated anyway) and 0.3% prevalence in people with LDL-C of 130-189 - it's a lot of testing for a very small yield. Did the authors look at how knowing a test result could improve discrimination or reclassification of risks? Then there is the poor man's genetic test: the electronic medical record, which allows the clinician and patient to see 10, 20, or even more years of lipid panels with a click of button, which is instantaneous and free. Though less precise, it's pretty easy to identify a patient with lifelong high LDL-C (or non-HDL-C) values. With a limited health care budget, genetic testing for FH variants seems to be low value. But work like this is really important and I appreciate seeing it done so well. Thanks for advancing our understanding - Jim
CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None Reported
READ MORE
Original Investigation
January 31, 2024

Familial Hypercholesterolemia Variant and Cardiovascular Risk in Individuals With Elevated Cholesterol

Author Affiliations
  • 1Division of General Medicine, Columbia University, New York, New York
  • 2Cardiovascular Disease Initiative, Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge
  • 3Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
  • 4Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
  • 5Division of Cardiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
  • 6Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai, New York, New York
  • 7Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
  • 8Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Personalized Medicine, Mass General Brigham, Cambridge, Massachusetts
  • 9Department of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
  • 10Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
  • 11The Institute for Translational Genomics and Population Sciences, Department of Pediatrics, The Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California
  • 12Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • 13Department of Human Genetics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • 14Department of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • 15Human Genetics Center, Department of Epidemiology, Human Genetics, and Environmental Sciences, School of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston
  • 16Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
  • 17Division of Epidemiology & Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
  • 18The Brown Foundation Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
  • 19Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
  • 20Cardiovascular Health Research Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
  • 21Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle
  • 22Department of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington, Seattle
  • 23The Framingham Heart Study, Framingham, Massachusetts
  • 24Section of Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
  • 25Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
  • 26Department of Neurology, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
  • 27Department of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson
  • 28Center for Public Health Genomics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville
  • 29Richard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Outcomes Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
  • 30Department of Cardiology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
  • 31Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
JAMA Cardiol. 2024;9(3):263-271. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2023.5366
Key Points

QuestionÌý How do familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) genetic variants modify coronary heart disease (CHD) risk among adults with moderate (LDL-C 130-189 mg/dL) and severe (LDL-C≥190 mg/dL) hypercholesterolemia?

FindingsÌý In this pooled cohort study of 21 426 participants followed up with for a median of 18 years, FH variants were associated with a 2-fold higher CHD risk, even among individuals with moderately elevated LDL-C. The increased CHD risk appeared to be largely explained by the substantially higher lifetime cumulative LDL-C exposure in those with an FH variant vs those without.

MeaningÌý The findings suggest that genetic testing for FH may help refine risk stratification beyond LDL-C alone; clinical research is needed to assess the value of adding genetic testing to traditional phenotypic FH screening.

Abstract

ImportanceÌý Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a genetic disorder that often results in severely high low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and high risk of premature coronary heart disease (CHD). However, the impact of FH variants on CHD risk among individuals with moderately elevated LDL-C is not well quantified.

ObjectiveÌý To assess CHD risk associated with FH variants among individuals with moderately (130-189 mg/dL) and severely (≥190 mg/dL) elevated LDL-C and to quantify excess CHD deaths attributable to FH variants in US adults.

Design, Setting, and ParticipantsÌý A total of 21 426 individuals without preexisting CHD from 6 US cohort studies (Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study, Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults study, Cardiovascular Health Study, Framingham Heart Study Offspring cohort, Jackson Heart Study, and Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis) were included, 63 of whom had an FH variant. Data were collected from 1971 to 2018, and the median (IQR) follow-up was 18 (13-28) years. Data were analyzed from March to May 2023.

ExposuresÌý LDL-C, cumulative past LDL-C, FH variant status.

Main Outcomes and MeasuresÌý Cox proportional hazards models estimated associations between FH variants and incident CHD. The Cardiovascular Disease Policy Model projected excess CHD deaths associated with FH variants in US adults.

ResultsÌý Of the 21 426 individuals without preexisting CHD (mean [SD] age 52.1 [15.5] years; 12 041 [56.2%] female), an FH variant was found in 22 individuals with moderately elevated LDL-C (0.3%) and in 33 individuals with severely elevated LDL-C (2.5%). The adjusted hazard ratios for incident CHD comparing those with and without FH variants were 2.9 (95% CI, 1.4-6.0) and 2.6 (95% CI, 1.4-4.9) among individuals with moderately and severely elevated LDL-C, respectively. The association between FH variants and CHD was slightly attenuated when further adjusting for baseline LDL-C level, whereas the association was no longer statistically significant after adjusting for cumulative past LDL-C exposure. Among US adults 20 years and older with no history of CHD and LDL-C 130 mg/dL or higher, more than 417 000 carry an FH variant and were projected to experience more than 12 000 excess CHD deaths in those with moderately elevated LDL-C and 15 000 in those with severely elevated LDL-C compared with individuals without an FH variant.

Conclusions and RelevanceÌý In this pooled cohort study, the presence of FH variants was associated with a 2-fold higher CHD risk, even when LDL-C was only moderately elevated. The increased CHD risk appeared to be largely explained by the higher cumulative LDL-C exposure in individuals with an FH variant compared to those without. Further research is needed to assess the value of adding genetic testing to traditional phenotypic FH screening.

×