ÁñÁ«ÊÓƵ

Object moved to here.

Methodological Concerns and Potential Confounding Factors—Reply | JAMA Ophthalmology | ÁñÁ«ÊÓƵ Network

ÁñÁ«ÊÓƵ

[Skip to Navigation]
Sign In
Comment & Response
´¡±è°ù¾±±ôÌý25, 2024

Methodological Concerns and Potential Confounding Factors—Reply

Author Affiliations
  • 1NIHR School for Primary Care Research, Centre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
  • 2NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Research Collaboration, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
  • 3Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
JAMA Ophthalmol. Published online April 25, 2024. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2024.1030

In Reply We thank Yang and colleagues for their comments in response to our recent publication.1 We elected to use routinely collected electronic health records to allow a large sample size and the inclusion of a wide range of covariates. These records have been shown to be nationally representative in terms of age, sex, ethnicity, and socioeconomic deprivation. The records were collated from approximately 25% of the UK population, with high validity for diagnostic coding, including fractures, to reduce the impact of selection bias.2-4 Indeed, the limitations of this approach have already been stated in our article, including the inability to assess visual function or hospital treatments and a likelihood to report more serious falls requiring medical attention. Yet, other approaches, such as self-reporting of falls in surveys, are subject to recall bias.5 A deeper assessment into the strengths and limitations of our population-based approach has also been explored in a helpful commentary by Pundlik and Luo.6

The potential influence of confounders has been already highlighted in our Outcomes and Covariates section within the Methods.1 We controlled for a large number of potential (measured) confounders, but as in all observational studies, there is a risk of unmeasured confounding, which we acknowledge. Although no method can address for unmeasured confounding unless the mechanism is known, we have used advanced methods to try to minimize the risk of measured confounding. Thus, we conducted sensitivity analyses “using propensity scores to account for covariate imbalance between the cohorts within further Cox proportional hazard models.â€1 These “inverse-weighted probability models included more than 50 confounders,â€1 with adjustments listed in eTable 4 in Supplement 1. Both approaches showed similar results, giving weight to our findings.

Back to top
Article Information

Corresponding Author: Jung Yin Tsang, MRes, NIHR School for Primary Care Research, Centre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, Sixth Floor, Williamson Bldg, Oxford Road, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom (jungyin.tsang@manchester.ac.uk).

Published Online: April 25, 2024. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2024.1030

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Tsang reported receiving grants from the National Institute for Health and Care Research. Dr Ashcroft reported receiving grants from the National Institute for Health and Care Research, AbbVie, Almirall, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Novartis, UCB, and the Leo Foundation. No other disclosures were reported.

References
1.
Tsang  JY, Wright  A, Carr  MJ,  et al.  Risk of falls and fractures in individuals with cataract, age-related macular degeneration, or glaucoma.   JAMA Ophthalmol. 2024;142(2):96-106. doi:
2.
Wolf  A, Dedman  D, Campbell  J,  et al.  Data resource profile: Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) Aurum.   Int J Epidemiol. 2019;48(6):1740-1740g. doi:
3.
Herrett  E, Thomas  SL, Schoonen  WM, Smeeth  L, Hall  AJ.  Validation and validity of diagnoses in the General Practice Research Database: a systematic review.   Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2010;69(1):4-14. doi:
4.
Van Staa  TP, Abenhaim  L, Cooper  C, Zhang  B, Leufkens  HGM.  The use of a large pharmacoepidemiological database to study exposure to oral corticosteroids and risk of fractures: validation of study population and results.   Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2000;9(5):359-366. doi:
5.
Dai  W, Tham  YC, Chee  ML,  et al.  Falls and recurrent falls among adults in a multi-ethnic Asian population: the Singapore Epidemiology of Eye Diseases Study.   Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):7575. doi:
6.
Pundlik  S, Luo  G.  Investigation of population-based fall risk in eye diseases.   JAMA Ophthalmol. 2024;142(2):106-107. doi:
×