ÁñÁ«ÊÓƵ

[Skip to Navigation]
Sign In
Brief Report
´¡±è°ù¾±±ôÌý25, 2024

Omission of Axillary Dissection Following Nodal Downstaging With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

GiacomoÌýMontagna,ÌýMD, MPH1; Mary M.ÌýMrdutt,ÌýMD, MS2; Susie X.ÌýSun,ÌýMD3; et al CallieÌýHlavin,ÌýMD, MPH4; Emilia J.ÌýDiego,ÌýMD4; Stephanie M.ÌýWong,ÌýMD, MPH5,6; Andrea V.ÌýBarrio,ÌýMD1; Astrid BottyÌývan den Bruele,ÌýMD7; NeslihanÌýCabioglu,ÌýMD, PhD8; VaradanÌýSevilimedu,ÌýMBBS, DrPH9; Laura H.ÌýRosenberger,ÌýMD, MS7; E. ShelleyÌýHwang,ÌýMD, MPH7; ´¡²ú¾±²µ²¹¾±±ôÌý±õ²Ô²µ³ó²¹³¾,Ìý²Ñµþ³¦³óµþ10; µþä°ù²ú±ð±ôÌý±Ê²¹±è²¹²õ²õ´Ç³Ù¾±°ù´Ç±è´Ç³Ü±ô´Ç²õ,Ìý²Ñ¶Ù11; Bich DoanÌýNguyen-Sträuli,ÌýMD12; °ä³ó°ù¾±²õ³Ù¾±²¹²ÔÌý°­³Ü°ù³ú±ð»å±ð°ù,Ìý²Ñ¶Ù13,14; Danilo DíazÌýAybar,ÌýMD15; ¶Ù±ð²Ô¾±²õ±ðÌý³Õ´Ç°ù²ú³Ü°ù²µ±ð°ù,Ìý²Ñ¶Ù16; Dieter MichaelÌýMatlac,ÌýMD17; ·¡»å±¹¾±²ÔÌý°¿²õ³Ù²¹±è±ð²Ô°ì´Ç,Ìý²Ñ¶Ù18,19; ¹ó²¹²ú¾±²¹²ÔÌý¸é¾±±ð»å±ð±ô,Ìý²Ñ¶Ù20; ¹ó±ô´Ç°ù¾±²¹²ÔÌý¹ó¾±³Ù³ú²¹±ô,Ìý²Ñ¶Ù18,21; ¹ó°ù²¹²Ô³¦±ð²õ³¦´ÇÌý²Ñ±ð²¹²Ô¾±,Ìý²Ñ¶Ù22,23; ¹ó°ù²¹²Ô³ú¾±²õ°ì²¹Ìý¹ó¾±³¦°ì,Ìý²Ñ¶Ù17; ´³²¹³¦±ç³Ü±ð±ô¾±²Ô±ðÌý³§²¹²µ²¹²õ²õ±ð°ù,Ìý²Ñ¶Ù24; JörgÌýHeil,ÌýMD, PhD20; ±á²¹²õ²¹²ÔÌý°­²¹°ù²¹²Ô±ôı°ì,Ìý²Ñ¶Ù25; Konstantin J.ÌýDedes,ÌýMD12; LaszloÌýRomics,ÌýMD, PhD10; MaggieÌýBanys-Paluchowski,ÌýMD, PhD17; ²Ñ²¹³ó³¾³Ü³ÙÌý²Ñ³Ü²õ±ô³Ü³¾²¹²Ô´Ç²µ±ô³Ü,Ìý²Ñ¶Ù8; Maria Del Rosario CuevaÌýPerez,ÌýMD15; Marcelo ChávezÌýDíaz,ÌýMD15; ²Ñ²¹°ù³Ù¾±²ÔÌý±á±ð¾±»å¾±²Ô²µ±ð°ù,Ìý²Ñ¶Ù13,14; Mathias K.ÌýFehr,ÌýMD26; ²Ñ²¹³Ù³Ù±ð²¹Ìý¸é±ð¾±²Ô¾±²õ³¦³ó,Ìý²Ñ¶Ù27,28; ²Ñ³Ü²õ³Ù²¹´Ú²¹Ìý°Õ³Ü°ì±ð²Ô³¾±ð³ú,Ìý²Ñ¶Ù8; ±·²¹»å¾±²¹Ìý²Ñ²¹²µ²µ¾±,Ìý²Ñ¶Ù13,14; NicolaÌýRocco,ÌýMD, PhD29; NinaÌýDitsch,ÌýMD, PhD24; Oreste DavideÌýGentilini,ÌýMD30; Regis R.ÌýPaulinelli,ÌýMD, PhD31; Sebastián SoléÌýZarhi,ÌýMD32; SherkoÌýKuemmel,ÌýMD, PhD27,28; ³§¾±³¾´Ç²Ô²¹Ìýµþ°ù³Ü³ú²¹²õ,Ìý²Ñ¶Ù27; SimonaÌýdi Lascio,ÌýMD22,33; Tamara K.ÌýParissenti,ÌýMD26; Tanya L.ÌýHoskin,ÌýMS2; ±«·É±ðÌý³Òü³Ù³ó,Ìý²Ñ¶Ù11; ³Õ²¹±ô±ð²Ô³Ù¾±²Ô²¹Ìý°¿±¹²¹±ô±ô±ð,Ìý²Ñ¶Ù32; °ä³ó°ù¾±²õ³Ù´Ç±è³óÌý°Õ²¹³Ü²õ³¦³ó,Ìý²Ñ¶Ù11,14; Henry M.ÌýKuerer,ÌýMD, PhD3; Abigail S.ÌýCaudle,ÌýMD3; Jean-FrancoisÌýBoileau,ÌýMD, MSc5,6; Judy C.ÌýBoughey,ÌýMD2; ThorstenÌýKühn,ÌýMD, PhD34; ²Ñ´Ç²Ô¾±³¦²¹Ìý²Ñ´Ç°ù°ù´Ç·É,Ìý²Ñ¶Ù1; Walter P.ÌýWeber,ÌýMD13,14
Author Affiliations
  • 1Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
  • 2Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
  • 3Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
  • 4Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
  • 5Department of Surgery, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • 6Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • 7Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
  • 8Department of General Surgery, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Breast Surgery Service, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
  • 9Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
  • 10University of Glasgow and National Health Service Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Department of Academic Surgery, Glasgow, Scotland
  • 11Breast-Center Zurich AG, Zurich, Switzerland
  • 12Department of Gynecology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
  • 13Breast Center, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
  • 14University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
  • 15Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Guillermo Almenara Irigoyen National Hospital, Lima, Peru
  • 16Breast Cancer Unit, Comprehensive Cancer Center Zurich, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
  • 17Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
  • 18Department of Surgery and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
  • 19Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
  • 20Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Breast Unit, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
  • 21Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group, Vienna, Austria
  • 22Centro di Senologia della Svizzera Italiana, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Lugano, Switzerland
  • 23Gruppo Ospedaliero Moncucco, Ticino, Switzerland
  • 24Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
  • 25Division of Surgical Oncology, Institute of Oncology, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
  • 26Breast Center Thurgau, Frauenfeld, Switzerland
  • 27Interdisciplinary Breast Cancer Center/Breast Unit, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Germany
  • 28Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Gynecology with Breast Center, Berlin, Germany
  • 29Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University Federico II, Naples, Italy
  • 30Breast Surgery, San Raffaele University and Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
  • 31Federal University of Goiás, Araujo Jorge Cancer Hospital, Goiás, Brazil
  • 32Department of Radiation Oncology, IRAM–Universidad Diego Portales, Santiago, Chile
  • 33Service of Medical Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona, Switzerland
  • 34Department of Gynecology, Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany
JAMA Oncol. Published online April 25, 2024. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.0578
Key Points

QuestionÌý What is the rate of axillary recurrence after omission of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in patients with node-positive breast cancer that downstages to ypN0 with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and does this rate differ based on surgical technique?

FindingsÌý This multicenter retrospective cohort study of 1144 patients with node-positive breast cancer found that axillary recurrence after omission of ALND was rare (1.0% [95% CI, 0.49%-2.0%] at 5 years) with no difference by type of surgery (sentinel lymph node biopsy with dual-tracer mapping vs targeted axillary dissection).

MeaningÌý The findings of this study support omission of ALND in patients with ypN0 after axillary staging with sentinel lymph node biopsy or targeted axillary dissection.

Abstract

ImportanceÌý Data on oncological outcomes after omission of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in patients with breast cancer that downstages from node positive to negative with neoadjuvant chemotherapy are sparse. Additionally, the best axillary surgical staging technique in this scenario is unknown.

ObjectiveÌý To investigate oncological outcomes after sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) with dual-tracer mapping or targeted axillary dissection (TAD), which combines SLNB with localization and retrieval of the clipped lymph node.

Design, Setting, and ParticipantsÌý In this multicenter retrospective cohort study that was conducted at 25 centers in 11 countries, 1144 patients with consecutive stage II to III biopsy-proven node-positive breast cancer were included between April 2013 and December 2020. The cumulative incidence rates of axillary, locoregional, and any invasive (locoregional or distant) recurrence were determined by competing risk analysis.

ExposureÌý Omission of ALND after SLNB or TAD.

Main Outcomes and MeasuresÌý The primary end points were the 3-year and 5-year rates of any axillary recurrence. Secondary end points included locoregional recurrence, any invasive (locoregional and distant) recurrence, and the number of lymph nodes removed.

ResultsÌý A total of 1144 patients (median [IQR] age, 50 [41-59] years; 78 [6.8%] Asian, 105 [9.2%] Black, 102 [8.9%] Hispanic, and 816 [71.0%] White individuals; 666 SLNB [58.2%] and 478 TAD [41.8%]) were included. A total of 1060 patients (93%) had N1 disease, 619 (54%) had ERBB2 (formerly HER2)–positive illness, and 758 (66%) had a breast pathologic complete response. TAD patients were more likely to receive nodal radiation therapy (85% vs 78%; P = .01). The clipped node was successfully retrieved in 97% of TAD cases and 86% of SLNB cases (without localization). The mean (SD) number of sentinel lymph nodes retrieved was 3 (2) vs 4 (2) (P < .001), and the mean (SD) number of total lymph nodes removed was 3.95 (1.97) vs 4.44 (2.04) (P < .001) in the TAD and SLNB groups, respectively. The 5-year rates of any axillary, locoregional, and any invasive recurrence in the entire cohort were 1.0% (95% CI, 0.49%-2.0%), 2.7% (95% CI, 1.6%-4.1%), and 10% (95% CI, 8.3%-13%), respectively. The 3-year cumulative incidence of axillary recurrence did not differ between TAD and SLNB (0.5% vs 0.8%; P = .55).

Conclusions and RelevanceÌý The results of this cohort study showed that axillary recurrence was rare in this setting and was not significantly lower after TAD vs SLNB. These results support omission of ALND in this population.

Add or change institution
1 Comment for this article
Risk-adapted treatment optimisation of the axillary
kefah mokbel, MBBS MS FRCS | London Breast Institute
Thank you for sharing. This adds valuable support to the evidence from the B-51 trial data at 5 years. However, it's worth noting that the B-51 trial exclusively focused on N1 disease and assessed the omission of both ALND and radiation therapy in ypN0 patients. It's encouraging to see evidence regarding oncological safety concerning axillary recurrence for N2-3 disease. Nevertheless, the follow-up period is relatively short, and overall survival is a more optimal endpoint to consider besides axillary recurrence.

Professor Kefah Mokbel
Chair of breast cancer surgery
The London Breast Institute
CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None Reported
×